
Posted by gfbrandenburg | Filed under Uncategorized
29 Tuesday Aug 2017
28 Monday Aug 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
Jerry Rodrigues has actually managed to capture what I was able to see during the total eclipse of August 21, 2017. It’s a really great image, composed of many, many separate images captured between 2 seconds long to 1/4000 of a second. And then all those sub-images were combined together with great finesse, skill, and software.
Very remarkable.
This is what you missed, and it’s close to what I was trying to draw in my last post.
Here is the link:
http://www.astropix.com/2017_Total_Solar_Eclipse_Corona.html
21 Monday Aug 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
After spending most of the day making last minute modifications to my scope, it’s almost ready!
Among other things, I attached a shroud made of black 4 mil plastic sheeting and stabilized the mount so the OTA doesn’t fall out of the rocker box.
Just now, I was able to get both a white light image of the Sun thru a Baader filter (stopped down to f/24) as well as projection onto white paper. There is quite a display of major sun spots, all in a row, right near the center!
Yay! My work finally paid off!
(Photos will follow)
08 Tuesday Aug 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
NPR-WAMU just ran a piece on eclipse chasers, featuring professional astronomers like Fred Espenak and Jay Pasachoff, as well as an amateur from Brookland (me) as I was working at the CCCC on building a collapsible scope to take to Wyoming for the event.
Here's a link:
http://wamu.org/story/17/08/08/meet-eclipse-chasers-following-moons-shadow-addiction/
And no, I'm not an addict. It's just the most amazing natural phenomenon I've ever experienced.
Here are some pix of my project, which is far from being finished:




14 Friday Jul 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
Thomas Edison, Maria Mitchell, Allan Clark and others are featured in a book about how they stumbled scientifically when trying to observe various aspects of the 1878 North American Total Solar Eclipse. A review in Science is here.
04 Tuesday Jul 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
07 Sunday May 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
20 Thursday Apr 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
24 Friday Feb 2017
Posted in History, Math, Uncategorized
Tags
I recently learned some things about how the young George Washington did math, including surveying. Mathematician and historian V. Frederick Rickey gave a talk 2 nights ago at the Mathematical Association of America here in DC, based on his study of GW’s “cypher books”, and I’d like to share a few things I learned.
(1) The young George appears to have used no trigonometry at all when finding areas of plots of land that he surveyed. Instead, he would ‘plat’ it very carefully, on paper, making an accurate scale drawing with the correct angles and lengths, and then would divide it up into triangles on the paper. To find the areas of those triangles, he would use some sort of a right-angle device, found and drew the altitude, and then multiplied half the base times the height (or altitude). No law of cosines or sines as we teach students today.
(2) He was given formulas for the volumes of spheroids and barrels, apparently without any derivation or justification that they were correct, to hold so many gallons of wine or of beer. (You probably wouldn’t guess that you had to leave extra room for the ‘head’ on the beer.) Rickey has not found the original source for those formulas, but using calculus and the identity pi = 22/7, he showed that they were absolutely correct.
(3) GW was a very early adopter of decimals in America.
(4 ) This last one puzzled me quite a bit. It’s supposed to be a protractor, but it only gives approximations to those angles. The results are within 1 degree, which I guess might be OK for some uses. I used the law of cosines to convince myself that they were almost all a little off. Here’s an accurate diagram, with angle measurements, that I made with Geometer’s Sketchpad.
His method was to lay out on paper a segment 60 units long (OB) and then to construct a sixth-of-a-circle with center B, passing through O and G (in green). Then he drew five more arcs, each with its center at O, going through the poitns marked as 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 units from O. The claim is then that angle ABO would be 10 degrees. It’s not. It’s only 9.56 degrees.
12 Monday Dec 2016
Posted in astronomy, astrophysics, science, Telescope Making, Uncategorized
I had a productive 24 hours!

Productive 24 hours!